Attention is currently required from: Nico Huber, Thomas Heijligen, Paul Menzel, Edward O'Callaghan, Aarya.
View Change
1 comment:
File flashrom.c:
Patch Set #42, Line 1249: index
maybe a better identifier than "index" and short hand for "i"ndex then?
Maybe:
`index` -> `layout_idx`
`i` -> `eraser_idx`
looks like this:
layout[layout_idx]
chip->block_erasers[eraser_idx]
Would be better to understand at declaration level. However as an array_index it´s a bit doubling the words. Don´t know what to prefer.
What do you think?
To view, visit change 65879. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.
Gerrit-Project: flashrom
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Iafe78de00daa55f7114bd4ce09465dd88074ece4
Gerrit-Change-Number: 65879
Gerrit-PatchSet: 45
Gerrit-Owner: Aarya <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Simon Buhrow
Gerrit-Reviewer: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Gerrit-CC: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-CC: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-CC: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Thomas Heijligen <src@posteo.de>
Gerrit-Attention: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 09:42:51 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Simon Buhrow
Comment-In-Reply-To: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Aarya <aarya.chaumal@gmail.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment