View Change

1 comment:

• Commit Message:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 11: most

    What broke for you Nico? A local test for me didn't break on a Intel platform

    I was able to locally reproduce the failure with a Winbond, Thanks for picking this up quickly!

    It was reviewed it, just wasn't noticed due to the similar function names/files [`s25f_poll_status():s25f.c` / `spi_poll_wip():spi25.c`] and the specific chip I tested with locally.

    I agree with the big and invasive comment though, I put too much trust in the commit message explanation for that.

To view, visit change 40626. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.