Attention is currently required from: Edward O'Callaghan.
Patch set 3:Code-Review +1
1 comment:
File flashrom.c:
Patch Set #3, Line 377: STM50_SECTOR_ERASE
I am wondering if we should go the other way, renaming this to ERASE_SECTOR_STM50, since this would align with the other names above.
Same for the follow-up patches, e.g. erase_opaque. Related function names start with the operation type as prefix, as for example write_opaque or read_opaque.
To view, visit change 69047. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.