Re: [coreboot] How is depreciating 95% of coreboot boards worth it for such minor improvements?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 09/21/2017 04:52 PM, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
Hi Kyösti,
I can help you to get these to EARLY_CBMEM_INIT. That's the first obstacle with Geode. It's recommended that coreboot would store the timebase / TSC information so that cpufreq support is not needed in kernel. I have some on-going work on AMD timestamps anyways.
Please let me know what I can do to help you implement that. We have all hardware at hand and would be glad to fix that till ECC2017 if possible.
I also would like to work on upstreaming other alix and apu platform, but first want to clean things with cbmem.
BTW will you attend ? It would be great to meet you.
(...)
Do you mean supported boards table, and the 3rd column from left for ALIX 2C or ALIX 6 has invalid links? That would not be your fault. When alix.2d was pushed to board_status, it also refreshes .2c and .6 entries even when they don't exist as individual updates on the wiki.
Yes, this is what I meant. We get access to wiki and fixed that issue. Now correct logs were uploaded to supported boards site.
Best Regards, - -- Piotr Król Embedded Systems Consultant https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com
-
Piotr Król