I am walking through the code converting the sizeram() functions and have run across a duplicate 855pm and the i855pm.
The digitallogic/adl855pc is using the i855pm, so that appears to be the active one.
Is there a reason we have two of these? If not can we just delete src/northbridge/intel/855pm?
Eric
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I am walking through the code converting the sizeram() functions and have run across a duplicate 855pm and the i855pm.
my fault. Sorry, ignore 855pm.
Is there a reason we have two of these? If not can we just delete src/northbridge/intel/855pm?
yeah, delete it.
Thanks very much for looking this port.
It's worse than that. Early docs I had indicated it was the pm part but I think it is the GM part, so that code is probably GM code by now. I have not had time to go back and put that back together.
ron
"Ronald G. Minnich" rminnich@lanl.gov writes:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
I am walking through the code converting the sizeram() functions and have run across a duplicate 855pm and the i855pm.
my fault. Sorry, ignore 855pm.
Is there a reason we have two of these? If not can we just delete src/northbridge/intel/855pm?
yeah, delete it.
Deleted.
Thanks very much for looking this port.
It's worse than that. Early docs I had indicated it was the pm part but I think it is the GM part, so that code is probably GM code by now. I have not had time to go back and put that back together.
Ok. The GM and the PM appear to be strongly related so I don't think it is likely to be a problem. It is just a pain to start updating a port so it works and then you come to realize the port never worked.
Eric