After cvs updating this afternoon, i'm now unable to build the winfast-flash.config it fails with the attached error. I suspect this could be todo with the modification made for gcc 3. or i might be completely wrong. I would appreciate some help with this one.
Also is there an example of what i need to do to boot from IDE.
Thanks Russell
ICQ 4186920
Russell,
After cvs updating this afternoon, i'm now unable to build the winfast-flash.config it fails with the attached error. I suspect this could be todo with the modification made for gcc 3. or i might be completely wrong. I would appreciate some help with this one.
You need to change < struct irq_info slots[]; to
struct irq_info *slots;
-Andrew
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Russell Gower wrote:
After cvs updating this afternoon, i'm now unable to build the winfast-flash.config it fails with the attached error. I suspect this could be todo with the modification made for gcc 3. or i might be completely wrong. I would appreciate some help with this one.
I think my fix should work now.
here is what is in one of my files to boot ide.
option BOOT_IDE=1 # I really don't like having to include this line. dir /src/pc80/ide
option USE_ELF_BOOT=1 option RAMTEST=1 option CONFIG_LINUXBIOS_ENABLE_IDE=1 option CONFIG_LINUXBIOS_LEGACY_IDE=1
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andrew Ip wrote:
< struct irq_info slots[]; to
struct irq_info *slots;
andrew, are you sure that will work. The first usage means 'array of undefined length which will be set by an initializer', the second means 'pointer to a slot'. The second seems wrong to me.
ron
Sorry. My mistake...
-Andrew
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:09:39PM -0700, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andrew Ip wrote:
< struct irq_info slots[]; to
struct irq_info *slots;
andrew, are you sure that will work. The first usage means 'array of undefined length which will be set by an initializer', the second means 'pointer to a slot'. The second seems wrong to me.
ron
-
Andrew Ip -
Ronald G. Minnich -
Russell Gower