mopz0506 mopz0506 wrote:
What I do is just enable the E350M1 Winbound ACPI device in devicetree.cb. just change the "off" to "on" and everything works fine.
Aha! No code changes needed?
Is it OK to attach the patch in this mail list?
Normally everything goes via Gerrit, but because you prefer that I create the patch it is a good idea to use the mailing list.
Or you can patch it for me? I don't care about that.
OK! Please review http://review.coreboot.org/292 if it is the correct change and let me know.
I'm from China and I want keep anonymous to be safe.
No problem. Thanks for your help!
In fact, when I google "anonymous" to confirm my spelling, my government reset the tcp/ip connection between my computer and google's server.
Yes, I have heard similar stories about the great firewall before. I am happy that you can participate on the mailing list!
Forgive me please and many thanks.
Nothing to forgive.
//Peter
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se wrote:
OK! Please review http://review.coreboot.org/292 if it is the correct change and let me know.
Yes the patch is right.
Once patched we can use "power_on_after_fail" in cmos.layout to control this feature.
Without this patch the "power_on_after_fail" has been ignored.
I run it for just 2 days and seems OK.
Anyway not sure it is OK or not for a long run. I think it should be OK since it is a trivial patch.
Thanks,
mopz0506