[LinuxBIOS] Re: "Options.lb 2 XML" the 2nd

[Florian Zeitz]

Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Ok, I checked the script into the arch repository now, utils/optionlist.
>
> I changed the xsl sheet slightly so it works with my version of xsltproc
> and saxon. Which xsl processor are you using?
>
> Thanks for your work
>
> Stefan

To be honest I tried so many different xsl processors that I really 
can't remember what I finally used.
I think it was a good idea to make it XSLT 1.0 (again (I had it written 
in XSLT 1.0 first, too) as it seems a lot more processors can handle it. 
You might want to completely remove the xsl:choose stuff (so basically 
what is commented right now) it was a hack to get the xml (the 
unprocessed of course) to show correctly in firefox and is specific to 
XSLT 2.0 anyway because it uses xhtml as method.

[Steve Milo]

Pardon me but, am I to understand that XML is implemented in a firmware
environment?!

Steve M

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Florian Zeitz wrote:
> Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > Ok, I checked the script into the arch repository now, utils/optionlist.
> >
> > I changed the xsl sheet slightly so it works with my version of xsltproc
> > and saxon. Which xsl processor are you using?
> >
> > Thanks for your work
> >
> > Stefan
>
> To be honest I tried so many different xsl processors that I really
> can't remember what I finally used.
> I think it was a good idea to make it XSLT 1.0 (again (I had it written
> in XSLT 1.0 first, too) as it seems a lot more processors can handle it.
> You might want to completely remove the xsl:choose stuff (so basically
> what is commented right now) it was a hack to get the xml (the
> unprocessed of course) to show correctly in firefox and is specific to
> XSLT 2.0 anyway because it uses xhtml as method.
>
> LinuxBIOS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

[Stefan Reinauer]

* Steve Milo  [050320 20:39]:
> Pardon me but, am I to understand that XML is implemented in a firmware
> environment?!

for the purpose of automatically creating up to date documentation from
the code, yes indeed. There is no xml involved on the firmware level
itself.

Stefan