Thanks Aaron, yes this might be the only clean solution (I wanted to avoid it). Any way thanks again for your time!

Selma.

 

From: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 11:04 PM
To: Bensaid, Selma <selma.bensaid@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>; coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: failure cherry-picking patches from https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot

 

 

 

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:05 PM Bensaid, Selma <selma.bensaid@intel.com> wrote:

Thanks Peter and Aaaron!
For more context we observe this failure on our local coreboot hosted in GitHub (Intel Org). Cherry-picking from coreboot.org worked well until few days ago, where the failure showed up.
Looking into the logs (that I cannot attach) and if I understand well while fetching from a remote git looks for a common ancestor between the local repo and the remote. In our case this common ancestor is quite old (https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34368). It seems that the remote (coreboot.org) has a timeout mechanism that triggers before we find the common ancestor.
I think I figured out a dirty WA , any idea will be more than welcome!

 

This is not original thought, but since the ancestor is so old maybe it is the solution in the article: raise limits to get all the SHAs of the trees and objects. If it's too big then that might cause the hangup. I think it'd be good for someone on your end to do a proper rebase. Once that's complete I expect the fetchting to start working again.

Thanks,
Selma.


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:57 AM
To: coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: [coreboot] Re: failure cherry-picking patches from https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot

Aaron Durbin via coreboot wrote:
> > We are observing since 3 days instabilities while cherry-picking
> > patches from coreboot.org:
> >
> > git fetch https://review.coreboot.org/coreboot
> > refs/changes/40/52140/3 && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD
> >
> > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> >
> > fatal: protocol error: bad pack header
> >
> > This is happening on several machines, our automation is also impacted.
> > Any change/issue that could explain such behavior?
>
> I think it's on your end, Selma. Perhaps the git repo got corrupted?
..
> The root cause is likely the first error: remote end hung up unexpectedly.
> The following might be helpful.
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6842687/the-remote-end-hung-up-une
> xpectedly-while-git-cloning

My guess is either a change in an outgoing proxy at Intel or that all your repos changed in the same way at the same time to now interact badly with how outgoing proxying has always worked. (HTTP request larger than http.postBuffer git config setting leading to HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer.)


> Also if there's a way to get more verbose logging out that might help
> point in the right direction.

Do try (from that stackoverflow):

# Linux                                                                         
export GIT_TRACE_PACKET=1                                                       
export GIT_TRACE=1                                                             
export GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1                                                       

#Windows                                                                       
set GIT_TRACE_PACKET=1                                                         
set GIT_TRACE=1                                                                 
set GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1                                                         

Before the git command, and see what comes out.


//Peter
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org