Quoting
joe@smittys.pointclark.net:
Quoting Marc Karasek <Marc.Karasek@Sun.COM>:
It was not specifically x86_64 related. It
was however fedora 8
related. I think in my research that it has to do with the version of
binutils. I had sent out a mail to the reflector with a link to
another discussion group regarding binutils and a bug that looked like
it was this. According to the thread, a patch had been submitted to
the binutils tree to fix this issue. The version of binutils I have
that shows this problem is 2.17.50.0.18-1 2007073. I am looking to
upgrade to 2.18 as soon as it is avail (rpm) to see if this is fixed.
I found someone that built binutils-2.18.50.0.3-1 rpms here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27856
I will try it out and report back
SWEET:-) I rpm -Uvh 'd the three packages from the
above link (binutils, binutils-devel, binutils-debuginfo) and
everything is working great now, coreboot builds with no problems. Back
in business again.
Thanks - Joe
/*******************************************
On 28/01/08 21:38 +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 28.01.2008 21:12, coreboot information wrote:
revision 3085
Build Log:
Compilation of amd:serengeti_cheetah has been fixed
Compilation of amd:serengeti_cheetah_fam10 is still broken
See the error log at http://qa.coreboot.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=3085&device=serengeti_cheetah_fam10&vendor=amd
And we need another 2461 bytes increase due to the new compiler. Just in
case anyone wonders which compiler causes continuous size increases:
gcc version 4.3.0 20080117 (experimental) [trunk revision 131592] (SUSE Linux)
Nak. This is a more serious problem:
My system is:
gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
My sections are as follows:
.ram start 0xfffc0000 size 0x10098
.rom start 0xfffd0098 size 0xfac8
.id start 0xfffefd2
On the log from abuild, we can interpolate the results. .ram start is
hardcoded, and .rom starts immediately after .ram. So, based on this
line:
Section .id [00000000ffffefd2 -> 00000000ffffefef] overlaps section .rom
[00000000fffedd7c -> 00000000fffff96f]
We see that the .ram is (0xfffedd7c - 0xfffd0098) 122084 bytes larger on
the abuild machine then it is on my machine. That certainly isn't because
of little changes in the compiler. And .rom too has an increase,
(0xfffff96f - 0xfffedd7c = 72691), which is 8491 bytes larger then my box.
Something is amiss here, and I need to put my head down with Stefan and
figure it out. But in the meantime, hiding the problem isn't going to help
anybody.
Jordan