Hi Paul,

last time was with a yonah / 945gm / ich7 based system. i think that was 3-4 years ago (coreboot v2?)

maybe that statement is somewhat subjective and i have just more experience with stuff like that in the meantime. i don't have that code anymore but i think things a
just more straight forward and understandable.

moreover i found it was a lot easier to get a working build that at least puts out some postcodes and debug log. i think it didn't even compile without modifications the last time.
an very important reason is that i have excatly the same board - having (intel) reference boards actively supported makes starting much easier. last time it was hard to find a supported mainboard that could be bought somewhere. 

best regards,

karl.







2014-06-21 10:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>:
Dear Karl-Heinz,


Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schrieb Karl-Heinz Nirschl:

> i did some experiments with the baytrail fsp coreboot and first of all i
> like to say thanks for all the good code! everything looks much better than
> the last time i tried to do anything with coreboot.

could you please elaborate on that statement? When was that last time
and what device/board did you look at? I ask because in my experience
the majority of coreboot code lives up to a high standard since several
years now.

[…]


Thanks,

Paul

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot