> let's pause this discussion until the new mailing list is up, and then move it there, ok? This is not technical
> It's decreasing the signal to noise ratio on this list.

It is NOT a NOISE, Ron... It is true ESSENCE. Do you, Ron, after all, think, I am a noise??? INTEL does think I am (fatal mistake). Don't you agree?? I am, after all, Open Source stray dog... And.. You would like to understand it?! Don't you?! You are GOOGLE (protected) dog, and INTEL dogs are trying out there to intercept me... Other stray dogs... .. . :-)))  I laugh... why, Ron???

Do you think they are successful?!  Really???

I am sorry to disappoint you. NO NOISE here... And if you do serve to INTEL main purposes... DO not distract with tricks, and proxys' to make it much easier for flock sheep... 

I am not fighting Purism, Ron, mu targets are much higher... Imagine! ;-)

Don't You agree?

TRUE essence. For TRUE purposes (I could NOT be blackmailed, never ever)! 

Sorry to be Honest Straight! 
Zoran Stojsavljevic

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:43 PM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
let's pause this discussion until the new mailing list is up, and then move it there, ok? This is not technical. It's decreasing the signal to noise ratio on this list.

Thanks

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:55 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic <zoran.stojsavljevic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for that. My last sentence probably doesn't even express what
> I was trying to say. Could be my bad English.

Your English is quite good.

> I just meant that there are people who are easily offended by dishonesty.

Tell me about dishonesty, Nico. What Purism does is just a pebble of sand in the desert of big IT companies' dishonesty!

Zoran Stojsavljevic


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> wrote:
On 10.10.2017 20:02, Youness Alaoui wrote:
>> So my conclusion, Purism draws customers from other Linux supporting
>> vendors with dishonest marketing. If that doesn't bother you, fine.
>> But please don't get angry if it bothers honest people.
>
> ...
> 3 - By stating that it "bothers honest people", right after saying
> that it doesn't bother me, you're implying that I'm not an honest
> person (at least that's how I read it) and that kind of statement
> doesn't lead to cool headed discussions, so I'll simply withdraw from
> this one.

Sorry for that. My last sentence probably doesn't even express what
I was trying to say. Could be my bad English. I just meant that there
are people who are easily offended by dishonesty. Well, yeah, it does
imply that I don't count you among them.

Nico

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot