well, perhaps not so weird... the #ifdef 0 is weird. Shouldn't it be #if 0 instead to comment out stuff? :-)

Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> [060524 02:06]:
  
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
    
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> [060523 20:09]:
      
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
        
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:

          
I have no platform on which LinuxBIOS runs on, but it caused no
regression
in abuild. (But a lot of targets do not seem to compile at all, even
without
my patch. Does this depend on the gcc version? I have gcc 3.3.5)
            
don't know, I will try to test your patch via abuild but I don't want to
commit until then.
          
Yes, it was a gcc bug. gcc 4.1.0 has no problems compiling it.
I'll continue testing and developing with gcc 4.1.0 from now on.
        
Can we get it compiling with 3.3.5 as well? What's the bug about?
I'm using 4.1 as a reference compiler at the moment, but lots of people
out there have older compilers I think...
      
LinuxBIOSv2-2310/src/cpu/amd/model_gx2/cpubug.c:199:75: missing terminating ' character
LinuxBIOSv2-2310/src/cpu/amd/model_gx2/cpubug.c:205:70: missing terminating ' character
    

Indeed weird! This is in the middle of #ifdef 0?