On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Antony Stone wrote:
This would then be a violation of the GPL. If you
produce something based
on GPL code, you must distribute the source (or make it available) as well as
the binary. There's no such thing as binary-only GPL code.
yes, and to reiterate, if you never distribute binary, then you don't have
to distribute source. E.g. IBM never released the linuxbios code they
wrote for an SiS chipset as the project got cancelled.