---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Darmawan Salihun <darmawan.salihun@gmail.com>
Date: Apr 22, 2007 8:15 AM
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Intel Southbridge ROM Protection mechanism
To: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>

On 4/20/07, Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> wrote:
* Darmawan Salihun <darmawan.salihun@gmail.com> [070419 19:22]:
> the matter, does Intel ICH5 southbridge  (or other newer Inte southbridge)
> still protects (probably mirrors) the last 8KB block (bootblock) in the BIOS
> chip even when the protection bits in Block Locking Registers (BLRs) has been
> disabled?
>     I experienced weird results between several flashing attempts using
> flashrom in Linux. SOme succeeded, some retain the original values. Anyone has
> an explanation on the issue?

Some flash chips support "write protecting" their boot block (and/or other
blocks). I think the data sheets have more details on this.

What flash chip are you using?

Winbond W39V040FA

Usually if the south bridge or a GPIO does the protection, you'd be able
to write all or nothing. AFAIK


At some points I couldn't write at all. Maybe there is a a timing issue in the code that I added. Gonna check it again.


--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info@coresystems.de  • http://www.coresystems.de/



--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-= Human knowledge belongs to the world =-


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-= Human knowledge belongs to the world =-