On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:55:19PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Ward Vandewege
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:42:18PM -0600, Myles
At any rate, Myles, maybe you should bump the
coreboot rev for s2895
in buildrom to the one you have confirmed working?
I always argued for buildrom
using the latest version of Coreboot. In this
case the payload (SeaBIOS) continued to evolve.
Yeah - but having a 'known good' combination in buildrom is quite useful too.
That's what I'm saying. Since we don't have SeaBIOS versioned (we
would have had to bump it many times since January), It wasn't known
good anymore. I don't see an easy solution since we have so few
buildrom users to scream when things break.
Ah - sorry, the problem is that we track HEAD for seabios. Can't we just use
a git revision number for seabios?
Ward Vandewege <ward(a)fsf.org>
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator