On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:44 AM Alex G. <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/29/2015 09:48 AM, Marc Jones wrote:
> Hello coreboot,

Hi Marc

> Please limit comments to specific items in this version. If you have
> additions for the next version (if needed), the draft document is open
> for comment.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wMdDUAZR2Z9V7hcs3IhIOqw6sYQxb3vPEmbITTCrOwU/edit?usp=sharing

That looks pretty good. I think you've done a great job of clarifying
the requirements of ISA vs non-ISA blobs compared to the last version.
I've made some comments on it to ask for clarification about the
versioning requirements.

While not necessarily specific to this version, are we still considering
forbidding "no-reverse engineering" and "no-modification" clauses for blobs?


Thanks, I think it is all open for discussion and could go in the next version. It might be a good idea, but that might be too limiting and we would have to remove all blobs and they would be hosted somewhere else, which defeates the utility of the blobs dir. We would like intel to push to blobs/ but I think that would be a huge blocker for them.

Marc
 
Alex
--
http://marcjonesconsulting.com