> I know that an i7-820QM (Clarksfield) is perfectly capable of working> with 8 GB DIMMs and probably up to 32 GB or even more (the Thinkpad> W510 has 4 DIMM slots and I have tested it with 20 GB) and that is from> around the same time as the Arrendale chips - which does not mean> anything but I still refuse to accept that Nehalem is that limited. The
> official specs are not trustworthy IMHO and cpuid(1) and /proc/cpuinfo
> show the same physical address width of 36 bits (which would indicate a> maximum of 64 GB).
And let me add... Stefan, you are perfectly correct, to the highlighted RED marked by me in your original text/email. Nehalem is perfectly capable of addressing MORE than 8GB of DDR. And it can support for sure 16GB, maybe even 32GB of DDR.
And I even might know (actually, certainly, I do) why LENOVO 410s is NOT able/capable to support 8GB DIMMs.
Let me throw this challenge to INTEL IOTG. If they (after all, it is INTEL technology, isn't it!?) know what is the root cause of this problem, and then how to fix this problem. ;-)
INTEL IOTG, floor all yours!
Zoran