Myles Watson wrote:
The attached patch calls init() again. It makes it match the comments again.
Signed-off-by: Myles Watson mylesgw@gmail.com
Acked-by: Peter Stuge peter@stuge.se
It makes sense to use values in the device tree to parameterize device code for specific mainboards, but I don't see the point of parameterizing mainboard-specific code from the device tree.
It's no secret that I'd like coreboot to have zero mainboard-specific code, and allow parameters to be used to completely describe a board.
//Peter