I think of the fallback as the recovery if the normal fails. This is kind of an ideological point, but shouldn't the fallback be a minimal recovery version?

Jordan

At 03:52 PM 11/18/2003 -0700, you wrote:

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jordan Archer wrote:

> I'm pretty sure that it's not 32 bit reset code. The problem appears if I
> try to build an image without a fallback.

oh. When I try to build an image without a fallback (this part is
counterintuitive) I always just build a fallback. Possibly that's the
wrong thing to do :0)

ron

_______________________________________________
Linuxbios mailing list
Linuxbios@clustermatic.org
http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios