20 Oct
2009
20 Oct
'09
9:50 p.m.
No, I haven't been editing the logs. I sent you exactly what I saw on the serial port.
--
Hugh Greenberg
Los Alamos National Laboratory, CCS-1
Email: hng@lanl.gov
Phone: (505) 665-6471
Myles Watson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Hugh Greenberg <hng@lanl.gov
> mailto:hng@lanl.gov> wrote:
>
> I have been power cycling since you pointed it out last time.
>
> So have you been editing the logs (removing the first bit before the
> HT reset)?
>
> pos=0x8a, unfiltered freq_cap=0x8075
> pos=0x8a, filtered freq_cap=0x35
> pos=0xce, unfiltered freq_cap=0x35
> freq_cap1=0x35, freq_cap2=0x15
> dev1 old_freq=0x4, freq=0x4, needs_reset=0x0
> dev2 old_freq=0x4, freq=0x4, needs_reset=0x0
>
> This is link 0, and it says it is already running at the maximum
> frequency, so it doesn't need a reset. A cold boot should start at
> 200MHz and always need a reset. Here's an example from SimNOW:
>
> dev1 old_freq=0x0, freq=0x4, needs_reset=0x1
> dev2 old_freq=0x0, freq=0x4, needs_reset=0x1
>
> If you haven't been editing the logs, then maybe there's something
> wrong with the early serial port initialization. That would be good
> to know.
>
> Thanks,
> Myles