Hi,

I noted this on this thread's companion regarding AGESA, but I'd be willing to put up some money on https://www.bountysource.com/ for migration away from ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK.
I could have sworn asus/am1i-a mentioned over there was a BinaryPI board.

Thoughts?

Sincerely,
    -Matt

On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 2:10 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo <jorgefm@cirsa.com> wrote:
>Lots of things I could but will not volunteer to. I have every reason
>to believe any party requesting amd/bettong to be maintained, and
>having access to such board, has designed and potentially manufactured
>some custom board based on that particular reference design. Yet I
>have not seen this party contributing anything to the maintenance of
>the tree in the past 4 or so years. What goes around comes around, I
>don't mind amd/bettong disappearing at all.

In my case I have a bettong and pademelon demoboards and i would like
to get them supported by coreboot. We don't manufacture any product with
these processors but maybe they are viable options in a near future.

I've been able to make it work the vboot, a TPM/TPM2 through LPC and the SATA
but there are minor changes that I don't mind to contribute. I think that I only can
be useful to report the board status with every release but I think I'm not able to
develop any feature on them.

Regards
Jorge
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-leave@coreboot.org