Am Sonntag, den 29.09.2013, 23:31 +0200 schrieb Patrick Georgi:
Am 29.09.2013 23:16, schrieb Paul Menzel:
With the current approach it is difficult to see the actual changes to the template board. Especially in Gerrit. Therefore these board support patches are hard to review.
By fixing the tools. My main gripe with git still is its lack of serious file rename/copy tracking (though that can be worked around manually locally). While I can't speak for the git/gerrit communities, I'd guess they accept patches.
Sure, though unrealistic in my opinion. But until git is fixed, the problem of carefully and easily reviewing such patches persists.
As for what we can do with our own tools, and in particular on AMD boards: cut down on the duplication. There's lots of stuff in mainboards that - to me - looks it really belongs into chipset code. That should simplify reviews even more than hacks to work around git's metadata tracking limitations.
Agreed. But nobody has done this either and have not heard of somebody working on this.
While I agree, that the above is the better solution, I think it is unrealistic to assume, that this is going to happen in the foreseeable future. In my opinion, the duplication is not going to be removed, until patches adding them are accepted and pushed. And that seems unfeasible too.