On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Myles Watson <mylesgw@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed.
>
> Code isn't interesting anyway; design / architecture is the problem
> here.
>
I think a discussion of where we are and where we want to go would be
> > We are all professionals - we can come to a consensus. Right now,
> > we're trying to figure out if we can make ELF perform the way we need
> > it to perform. If we can be satisfied that it can, then we move on.
> > If we cannot be satisfied, then the core team will have to make a
> > decision to move on to another alternative, and then we can debate the
> > details of SELF or something similar.
>
> I agree.
>
> So, what exactly *do* we need here, and *why*?
>
helpful. Feel free to correct my status summary.
Right now:
1. LAR format supports inclusion of:
a. bootblock
1. Can be copied out, but only re-used in same size ROM file
b. ELF segments (multiple segments with one entry point, from an
ELF)
1. Can't be extracted without losing entry point