On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> wrote:

Please note that iasl can't perform any of the functions of
gendsdt

dumping the dsdt to a file, then iasl -d and iasl -tc will produce the same thing, but with some sort of optimizations. Disabling the optimizations, with -oa should produce exactly the same output as gendsdt, except for whitespace, the copyright header, and some dsdt header info (compiler, etc). You're entirely correct about genfadt vs iasl though, and now you've got me thinking that two utiliities is a better idea.

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 08:15:24PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Can we at least agree on the name of the directory where the tool(s)
> should live? Should we call it gen_acpi or genacpi? I'd say you decide

genacpi sounds good.

Uwe.

Ack. Here's a sign-off to make it with:

Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood <corey.osgood@gmail.com>

-Corey