5 comments:
File Documentation/technotes/2019-12-firmware-testing.md:
Patch Set #3, Line 39: So these are
"So these are ... Requirement 1 ... and ... […]
Done
Patch Set #3, Line 63: Requirement
Does it include things like IFD or ME? […]
That's really orthogonal to the test tool itself. Clarified that getting an image is out of scope of testing.
Patch Set #3, Line 70: Requirement
I don't see that being useful. It only adds complexity in the dispatcher.
It's mostly "if test X didn't succeed, don't bother with tests Y and Z (because they're bound to fail)". Rephrased it.
Patch Set #3, Line 106: The language should be popular and the implementation robust.
I styled the doc in having prose explaining the properties and with requirements extracted from them […]
Rephrased it here to provide some more motivation _why_ requirement 9 is desirable.
File Documentation/technotes/2019-12-firmware-testing.md:
Issues with LAVA: […]
Thanks, I added this.
To view, visit change 37643. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.