THe idea is that this change is an identical copy of stoneyridge. Follow-up changes then correct everything that differs, so that one can see the difference between stoney and picasso.
6 comments:
File src/soc/amd/picasso/Kconfig:
Patch Set #3, Line 16: STONEYRIDGE
looks like it is intentional
Indeed.
File src/soc/amd/picasso/chip.c:
Patch Set #3, Line 17: include <console/console.h>
if I'm not wrong, this is not used
It is used. See the end of this file, which makes use of the function: void post_code(u8 value);
Patch Set #3, Line 35: stoneyridge
is it intentional?
Yes, see recent change log messages, as well as Patchset 2.
This applies to all the comments about "stoney" being in this patch.
File src/soc/amd/picasso/enable_usbdebug.c:
Patch Set #3, Line 22: <device/pci_def.h
maybe not used?
Looks like it. Should be fixed on stoneyridge as well.
File src/soc/amd/picasso/include/soc/nvs.h:
Patch Set #3, Line 20: stoneyridge
is it intentional?
Yes.
File src/soc/amd/picasso/tsc_freq.c:
Patch Set #3, Line 33: Family 15h Models 70h-7Fh
17h ?
The code still needs to be changed to work for picasso chips.
To view, visit change 32407. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.