1. What is the motivation for this? Are we just trying to save a few bytes of bootblock space? (Otherwise, the extra hassle of having to put yet another FMAP section everywhere seems more like a downside to me...)

2. Why does this have to be done by cbfstool? Wouldn't it be easier to just put this as a struct in a C file, compile it, objcopy to binary and use cbfstool write?

(And if the goal just is to save bootblock space we could also have that C file and just put it as a separate file into CBFS -- we already have cbfs-files-processor-struct to make that easy. FMAP sections really only need to be used when alignment to erase blocks is important, I don't see how that would apply here.)

View Change

To view, visit change 40376. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.