2 comments:
File src/commonlib/bsd/cbfs_mcache.c:
Patch Set #4, Line 72: ERROR("mcache overflow, should increase CBFS_MCACHE size!\n");
The goal of the design is that things are still usable when the cache is too small. […]
I changed my mind a bit about how this works -- I still think we need to support cases with RW updates where the mcache might overflow, but I am passing CB_CBFS_CACHE_FULL out to the caller now so that the decision what to do about it can be made at that level.
See above... this is necessary to support the cache full case. […]
Changed now as mentioned above. Pushed the responsibility for this to the caller so it can decide whether to die() or fall back to cbfs_lookup() or whatever. Makes the function signature a bit less bulky, too.
To view, visit change 38423. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.