2 comments:
Patch Set #1, Line 131: tse->entry_stamp = ts_time - ts_table->base_time;
If I visualize this correctly, timestamps prior to CBMEM coming online will have ts_table->base_time subtracted twice?
Patch Set #1, Line 154: printk(BIOS_INFO, "Timestamp - %s: %llu\n", timestamp_name(id), ts_time);
If we define this to show raw/absolute timestamp, we could print this in !ts_table case too, and move up a couple lines. It is currently confusing that cbmem -c and cbmem -t will not have same output due to ts_table->base_time.
To view, visit change 38300. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.