Attention is currently required from: Felix Held, Felix Singer, Lean Sheng Tan, Martin L Roth, Nico Huber.
1 comment:
File util/crossgcc/buildgcc:
Patch Set #1, Line 779: CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET_EXTRA
No idea why you'd want to drop libgcc?
I was under the misapprehension that we currently only use it in RISCV because I could only find the `print-libgcc-file-name` stuff in the RISCV makefiles. Seeing now that we link to it everywhere I withdraw my statement. But I also said that I want to see if it makes sense to remove it and not that I want to remove it.
(like 64-bit operations when compiling for 32-bit)
Not sure why we need libgcc for that? It doesn't seem to be depending too much on the compiler considering that we use the same library for clang.
Thanks for the clang comment. I didn't see that before.
To view, visit change 80139. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.