We have two conflicting standards here: selfboot and RiscV BBL.
Other arch like arm still use the coreboot table on SELF, even though the kernel requires a devicetree as argument.
Changing the argument of SELF would break libpayload (which could be fixed).
If we'd decide to always use the RiscV bbl calling conventions it needs to be documented in Documentation/. -2 until at least documentation is added to avoid future confusion about conflicting standards.

Patch set 10:Code-Review -2

View Change

To view, visit change 31477. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.