Now I'm wondering: With nb/intel/fsp_rangeley fixed, would it build
w/o a do_soft_reset() implementation?

I've never seen any Intel chipset that would not do a hard reset if
it detects a prior soft reset. So having a do_soft_reset() for Intel
doesn't make much sense.

The situation is even more annyoing if you look at soc/intel/common/.
They just redefined the meaning of the different resets.

View Change

1 comment:

• File src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/reset.c:

  • Patch Set #2, Line 23:

    Guess who seems to be the only one calling soft_reset()? it's
    nb/intel/fsp_rangeley... That call should be fixed, I guess.

To view, visit change 28862. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.