Patch Set #1, Line 59:
return PCI_SLOT(dev->path.pci.devfn) == 1;
Is this defined in some standard or just happens to be the case for the
Patch Set #1, Line 69:
dev->hotplug_buses = 32;
I'd prefer a virtual PCI bridge instead, each having assinged one downstream device of type DEVICE_P […]
While I like this idea. The `hotplug_buses` implementation seems clean
and small enough?
Patch Set #1, Line 80:
slot = alloc_dev(dev->link_list, &slot_path);
don't you need to allocate "hotplug_buses" devices, as every potential device could have two 256MiB […]
I don't follow, are you suggesting to allocate a total of 2x 8GiB?
That's not even possible with non-prefetchable resources (standard
bridges have only a 32-bit window, IIRC). And our allocator is also
still limited to 32 bit.
Also, AIUI, 256MiB is just an arbitrary number, it's not a real
limit, is it?
To view, visit change 35946. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.