Patch Set 19:

Patch Set 19:

Coming back to this. I think we can agree that renaming of RELOCATABLE_RAMSTAGE(if really required) should probably be done as a separate commit and this change can focus primarily on clean up for the stage cache Kconfigs. Does that make sense?

https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/message/PCP6EI6UV6CFKVZCRO6SGDWIIWVGF5FQ/

In 24 April 2019 coreboot leadership minutes, you find mention that "Relocatable ramstage (on x86)" would be requirement for 4.11 release for platforms to stay on upstream master branch. I feel we just cause confusion if we rename the variable now, but no -2/+2 from me should such commit appear.

Equally my -2 here shall disappear if you can avoid the renaming.

I am totally fine with keeping "Relocatable ramstage" configs as is.

View Change

To view, visit change 33116. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.