Patch Set 1:

Hi,
I presume you have a reason for doing this but I'm confused about the purpose of making these changes.
From a functional perspective this change is fine but why do this?

Conventions and consitency with naming helps. We are currently evaluating ways to replace some/most/lot of pci_devfn_t with struct device *, and potentially auto-generating these _DEVFN_ from devicetree.cb where necessary.

The prefix XXX_ is arbitrary. Would SCH_ or PCH_ be somewhat correct?

View Change

To view, visit change 35730. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.