1 comment:
File src/commonlib/bsd/cbfs_private.c:
Patch Set #11, Line 75: offset + sizeof(mdata.h), todo) != todo)
As long as it doesn't pass the overflowing file entry back out to anywhere, I don't see the difference.
If we are confident about our builds not getting into situation like that w/ the corresponding cbfstool changes then I think that is sufficient.
In that case, I don't see why I should brick their whole boot when coreboot could just as well just ignore it.
This is why I was asking about introducing policies that work for us, but not necessarily for others to handle the exceptional cases.
To view, visit change 38421. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.