1 comment:
Patch Set #1, Line 286: HAVE_RAMPAYLOAD
I'm only afraid that if anyone !X86 tries to enable it after it might cause different failure.
So you are saying one could accidentally put a `select HAVE_RAMPAYLOAD` into
their code?
yes that was the point
But then one could also argue that ARCH_X86 could be selected by
accident, no?
:) I'm enabling Rampayload for x86 now. So it shouldn't be the problem on x86.
To view, visit change 33263. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.