2 comments:
Patch Set #10, Line 54: region
Why region and not node?
I replaced with node. I believe the result doesn't change in both cases to use region->size and node->size, but using node->size is easier to understand.
Patch Set #10, Line 78: memcpy(dst, node->data, node->size);
I don't see how this would result in an error? true_size would still be non-zero, even if you didn't […]
I think the situation "region->size < node->size" never happens in the current implementation.
It's possible that region->size is larger than node->size in unpack_fdt() and otherwise the sizes are same in fit_payload().
To view, visit change 34535. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.