Patch Set 1:

Patch Set 1:

Does it make sense to have support for different versions of a binaryPI in coreboot for the same hardware? Why not upgrade to a newer binaryPI?

apu2 platforms have issues with newer binaryPI versions. That's why we stayed with 1.0.0.4

I don't think having binaries + headers depend on a board is a good solution for upstream coreboot, as it creates maintainability issues. Not my call to make though.

View Change

1 comment:

• File src/mainboard/pcengines/apu2/Kconfig:

  • Patch Set #1, Line 117: AGESA_USE_OLD_HEADER

    I'd be more specific about the version here.

To view, visit change 35906. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit settings.