April 2006 - OpenBIOS - mail.coreboot.org

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress
by Blue Swirl April 30, 2006

April 30, 2006

>Going to some non-native implementation would probably be doable but it >would also make the thing unneccesarily big and slow. I found C versions of ash(l|r)di3 and moved all the files to libgcc directory, is this better? > > In real hardware, the zs nodes are named zs@0,0 and zs@0,100000. Maybe >the > > address has some effect to naming? > >yes, the parent node needs a decode-unit and encode-unit method. See >drivers/pci.fs I added dummy methods, but there is no change. I'm afraid my Forth skills are so basic that while I can guess what the drivers/pci.fs and util/pci.fs are doing, I can't make a Sbus version. Could you help me? _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

1 0

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress
by Blue Swirl April 29, 2006

April 29, 2006

>But I did not check in the libgcc files. Instead I added inclusion of >gcc --print-libgcc in the make process. Can you try whether this works >for you? Maybe when not cross-compiling, but that's way too slow for me. I have built four different versions of cross-gcc's and while they all can compile, none has a working libgcc. That's why I had to remove the linking to libgcc and add the files. I think not using system libgcc is cleaner way, the same approach as taken in Linux kernel. Another solution would be getting rid of long long arithmetic. Here's my current version against SVN revision 3. I added most of the devices to the tree. There are two zs devices, but the other one can't be reached: 2 > cd /obio ok 2 > ls -2bc228 interrupt@0 -2bc180 counter@0 -2bc0dc eeprom@0 -2bc024 zs@0 -2bbed4 zs@0 ok 2 > cd zs ok 2 > .properties name "zs" device_type "serial" reg -- c : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 slave 1 model "mk48t08" intr -- 8 : 0 0 0 2c 0 0 0 0 keyboard 1 mouse 1 ok In real hardware, the zs nodes are named zs@0,0 and zs@0,100000. Maybe the address has some effect to naming? _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

2 4

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress
by Asif Haswarey April 26, 2006

April 26, 2006

Paul, I dont have any test docs or drafts for fibre-channel, iSCSI (and ethernet as well) for OpenBIOS at this point. Currently I develope FCode for Sun's and IBM's OpenFirmware. We hired a contractor to port existing FCode to the Apple server. But it did not get much recognition. Anyway, it would be awesome if QLogic at first released a none supported version of FCode for the OpenBIOS/PC platform. Then when it gets enough recognition from the OpenBIOS community, I will further endorse QLogic to release supported versions of fibre-channel, iSCSI and ethernet FCode for OpenBIOS. Then it would be even more awesome if companies like Dell/HP and may be even Sun and IBM realized the value of OpenBIOS for their x86 machines. To make this happen, the interest should start somewhere. I am going to attempt to make QLogic the pioneer in trying OpenBIOS. _____________ Asif Haswarey C1069W QLogic Corporation 26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Phone: 949.389.7607 Fax: 949.389.6308 -----Original Message----- From: openbios-bounces(a)openbios.org [mailto:openbios-bounces@openbios.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nasrat Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 1:02 PM To: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:13 -0700, Asif Haswarey wrote: > At some point I plan to start testing with OpenBIOS and endorse the > support of OpenBIOS in our fibre-channel and iSCSI products. Out of curiosity do you have drafts of how you see fibre-channel/iSCSI working with OpenBIOS/1275? Paul -- OpenBIOS http://openbios.org/ Mailinglist: http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo Free your System - May the Forth be with you

1 0

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress
by Asif Haswarey April 26, 2006

April 26, 2006

Hi Segher, Just wanted to mention that it is always safe to stick to the OpenFirmware spec as far as tokens are concerned. "int-property" might break the current Sun's tokenizer, unless "int-property" exists in the tokenizer dictionary or it is explicitly defined earlier in the FCode. The key to increase the credibility and interest of OpenBIOS among the masses is to _not break the OF spec_. (By-the-way, I am not criticizing anyone.) At some point I plan to start testing with OpenBIOS and endorse the support of OpenBIOS in our fibre-channel and iSCSI products. _____________ Asif Haswarey C1069W QLogic Corporation 26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Phone: 949.389.7607 Fax: 949.389.6308 -----Original Message----- From: openbios-bounces(a)openbios.org [mailto:openbios-bounces@openbios.org] On Behalf Of Segher Boessenkool Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 11:50 AM To: The OpenBIOS Mailinglist Cc: stepan(a)coresystems.de Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress > d# 256 encode-int " mmu-nctx" int-property Use either d# 256 " mmu-nctx" int-property or d# 256 encode-int " mmu-nctx" property (The former is shorter, the latter is standard OF, can be tokenized). Segher -- OpenBIOS http://openbios.org/ Mailinglist: http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo Free your System - May the Forth be with you

2 1

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32 progress
by Stefan Reinauer April 26, 2006

April 26, 2006

* Blue Swirl <blueswir1(a)hotmail.com> [060425 21:38]: > 2 > cd / ok > 2 > ls > -2c45e0 aliases > -2c453c openprom > -2c42e8 options > -2c4270 chosen > -2c418c builtin > -2bf2f8 packages > -2bdc38 memory > -2bdb94 STP1012PGA > -2bda40 iommu > ok > 2 > cd iommu ok > 2 > ls > -2bd9c8 sbus > ok Very cool! Did you hardcode the amount of memory or do you probe it from the emulator? > Next step would be adding SBus device tree and SCSI devices. Yes. Most likely other parts of the device tree are missing as well. > I have to confess that I don't know much Forth except the RPN notation and > some Sun OBP commands. Can I print the device attributes somehow, like OBP > .attributes command? there's .properties to show device properties and ls to show sub device nodes and words to show methods defined for the current node. > I can't cd to the STP1012PGA node unless the device is renamed to something > shorter. Is this a limitation somewhere? Maybe an unintended one ;) But not a natural limitation. How do you create the node? Stefan -- coresystems GmbH · Brahmsstr. 16 · D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.: +49 761 7668825 · Fax: +49 761 7664613 Email: info(a)coresystems.de · http://www.coresystems.de/

3 3

byebye tla
by Stefan Reinauer April 26, 2006

April 26, 2006

Hi, since nobody except me really dared checking anything into the repository since I switched to GNU arch/tla I decided to move on to something more practical: Subversion It's easier to use, the tools are less buggy and have a less braindead user interface / command line than GNU arch. Go ahead and do a clean checkout with: svn co svn://openbios.org/openbios/openbios-devel You can download the latest snapshot at: http://openbios.org/viewcvs/openbios-devel.tar.gz?root=OpenBIOS&view=tar Watch the tree in your web browser here: http://openbios.org/viewcvs/openbios-devel/?root=OpenBIOS The documentation on the website will be updated asap. Stefan -- coresystems GmbH · Brahmsstr. 16 · D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.: +49 761 7668825 · Fax: +49 761 7664613 Email: info(a)coresystems.de · http://www.coresystems.de/

1 0

Re: [OpenBIOS] Sparc32/64 support
by Blue Swirl April 23, 2006

April 23, 2006

Hi, I made a first attempt for Sparc32 support, patch attached. Currently we get this far: boot arg = 0x0 0000000000000000-0000000000000000 RAM 0 MB Checksum invalid (d93e0f8c)! forth started. initializing memory...done panic: no dictionary entry point. Unhandled Exception 0x00000002 PC = 0x00000008 NPC = 0x0000000c Stopping execution Any comments or suggestions? _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

1 0

Sparc32/64 support
by Blue Swirl April 22, 2006

April 22, 2006

Hi, I've been working on Sparc32/64 support for Qemu. Currently Qemu for Sparc32 uses Proll as a system boot rom, but it's not a very good starting point for Sparc64. Basically, Linux expects a bit too much from the OpenFirmware interface, like Forth support etc. I guess OpenBIOS would be a better choice. How complete do you think OpenBIOS is, can it boot Linux for example on some architecture? Is there any support for 64-bit architectures? _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

2 1

Restoring BIOS
by preet April 9, 2006

April 9, 2006

Hi. Recently cleared the BIOS of my Abit IS7-V2 motherboard. And the result was my system wont display anything on the screen. I can hear the cpu running that is the POST has loaded but not the BIOS. Is that possible that the BIOS has completely lost and is there a way to restore it... THANKS -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Restoring-BIOS-t1415766.html#a3815516 Sent from the OpenBIOS forum at Nabble.com.

2 4