August 2001 - OpenBIOS - mail.coreboot.org

[OT] Freebios
by Tobias Diedrich Sept. 1, 2001

Sept. 1, 2001

I don't know if anyone here is interested in this, but some time ago (1998) I started writing a pc-compatible bios for fun, but never finished it. So in case someone is interested in the little code I wrote you may find it at http://ranmachan.dyndns.org/~ranma/freebios-0.0.1.tar.gz (~67KB) ... [As long as my system is up, which should be nearly 24hours/day, and my internet connection and the dyndns.org dns updates are working...] I stopped because I had trouble figuring out how to enable SDRAM on my Pentium Mobo with Intel chipset... However for an older 486 Chipset there were specs in an old c't magazine, so I was able to boot into dos with this piece of code... (Don't know if it's still working, I did not try it recently... The floppy code is buggy IIRC... No HD support) Of course this probably doesn't help a bit with openbios development, but maybe someone will find it interesting to look at :-) GPL license, no reverse engineering of propriatary BIOSes was involved, I had to go with only a few books (Basically "PC Hardwarebook" and "PC Programmers Guide to low level Functions and Interrupts") -- Tobias PGP-Key: 0x9AC7E0BC - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

4 6

Re: boy is EFI a kludge!
by ebiederman＠lnxi.com Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

Ronald G Minnich <rminnich(a)lanl.gov> writes: > > Ron unless you have something better I'd suggest using one of the > > upcoming dual Itanium/P4 chipsets as a starting point. Then you could > > be certain the chipset worked before on x86 before trying to reverse > > engineer the cpu initialization for the Itanium... > > do we have a vendor name yet? I have seen reports that both Intel and IBM are working on chipsets that will support that. I think the reports were talking many way SMP but possibly that is because where Itanium is positioned. This looks like it may be in the McKinley time frame. I have a strange hunch that McKinley will be bus compatible with the P4. This is what I am picking up through osmosis reading the reviews. Eric - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

3 3

Re: [OpenBIOS] award bios source code - end of discussion
by Stefan Reinauer Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

* andye <awe(a)ftt.co.uk> [010828 11:09]: > Please send source > Regards Are you able to read more than 2 lines of mail or are you not able to determine what mails to send to whom? _Any_ other Mail to this list regarding stolen protected, stolen, proprietary source code of Award Bios or whatever software will force me to unsubscribe _everyone_ who asked for such from this list without any further notification _plus_ I will make this list moderated. I am sick of it - This is not a warez trader list. If you have anything to say to the subject OpenBIOS or IEEE 1275-1994 say it. If not, listen or leave. Best regards, Stefan Reinauer OpenBIOS project coordinator -- axiom: electronic devices only work if the smoke stays inside. proof: when smoke comes out they don't work anymore. - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

2 1

RE: [OpenBIOS] New power-up graphics BIOS.
by Ralph Stickley Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

SVGA may be standard, but which chip-set are you using ? The system setup can be highly unique for each CPU (PII, PIII, Celeron, Ultra-Low Power, etc), "co-processor" (440BX, 440TX, et. al.) and/or Super I/O.... These devices must be initialized before DRAM, PCI bus, etc will get started, even before the Video driver is loaded. Interested observer.... Ralph > ---------- > From: Gavin R. Brewer[SMTP:gavinbr@gavinbr.worldonline.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:27 PM > To: openbios(a)elvis.informatik.uni-freiburg.de > Subject: RE: [OpenBIOS] New power-up graphics BIOS. > > James, > > I would like to program in Intel generic 8088 mode, and assume an industry > standard SVGA chip. The code is aimed to be as simple as possible. > > All I would like to do, is to be able to program the SVGA registers to > move, > and rescan pixel efficiently. > > This should be done in a few lines of assembler code. Things like > Bresenham's algorithm etc, can be efficiently coded in C++, so there is no > need to overburden ourselves. > > Thanx, > Gavin. <|;-) > > PS. do you know any useful links where I can download asm snippets? > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-openbios(a)freiburg.linux.de > [mailto:owner-openbios@freiburg.linux.de]On Behalf Of James Logan > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:04 PM > To: openbios(a)elvis.informatik.uni-freiburg.de > Subject: Re: [OpenBIOS] New power-up graphics BIOS. > > > > Gavin, > I would love to help. have you started? what > chip will you be using? > James > > > - > To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de > with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message > - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

14 36

Re: boy is EFI a kludge!
by ebiederman＠lnxi.com Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

ebiederman(a)lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > Ronald G Minnich <rminnich(a)lanl.gov> writes: > > > OK, looking around, it's about what I expected. > > > > However one thing we might be able to use: EFI is called from something > > called SAL. SAL is real low-level stuff you will never see the source to > > that does all the horrible stuff that Intel won't tell us how to do. > > > > You don't need EFI. You need something to link to SAL that replaces EFI. I > > think that's our hook. > > So if intel won't cooperate we need to plan on reverse engineering SAL. Unless > IA64 dies soon it is probably a worthwhile investment. Ron unless you have something better I'd suggest using one of the upcoming dual Itanium/P4 chipsets as a starting point. Then you could be certain the chipset worked before on x86 before trying to reverse engineer the cpu initialization for the Itanium... That isn't a very aggressive plan but unless we start moving in a hurry it is probably a very workable one. Eric - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

2 1

abit motherboard
by Tobak Jeno Aug. 29, 2001

Aug. 29, 2001

Hello! I have an abit bx6v2 motherboard. Can i use openbios with this? Jenci - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

2 1

Re: [OpenBIOS] Re: boy is EFI a kludge!
by Ronald G Minnich Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Per Jessen wrote: > >Hhmmm, that's just gratuitous eye candy, no? Besides, it's pretty trivial > >to replace those graphics with logos or other stuff. I think that doing > >things that are new and usefull (like serial consoles) would really help > >get people and hardware manufacturers interested. Imagine being able to > >run a server farm with no graphics cards, just a serial console and > >ethernet... > we make it easier. We do all our admin on linuxbios clusters over ethernet. Serial console admin is not our idea of a good time. To buy, see www.linuxlabs.com ron - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

2 3

Re: sorry, it works, K7SEM (fwd)
by Ronald G Minnich Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

Just a sample of what can happen. The K7SEM has two ethernet chips on it, both will probe fine. But if you try to really use the build-in sis900 chip, it hangs the board, because there is no PHY installed. So you really need a bios built for that specific motherboard. PC hardware is really just horrible. There ought to be a spec for reading vendor/mainboard ID. But the vendors change it so often that I doubt that would ever really work. ron ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:07:09 +0800 From: Ollie Lho <ollie(a)sis.com.tw> To: Nikolai Vladychevski <niko(a)isl.net.mx> Cc: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich(a)lanl.gov>, linuxbios(a)lanl.gov Subject: Re: sorry, it works, K7SEM Nikolai Vladychevski wrote: > > Ronald G Minnich writes: > > > please send us your kernel output. You can capture the serial output using > > minicom. > > yes, I am doing this, aparently it dies on loading sis900.c code .... I am > compiling the kernel without it, lets see what happends. this is the current > kernel output: > The is the problem. Do not include the SiS 900 driver for any 730 board which does not have PHY with it. Those boards with RTL 8139 as LAN device are in this category. The driver will hang the machine in probing PHY. Ollie - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

1 0

Re: [OpenBIOS] Re: boy is EFI a kludge!
by Per Jessen Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:58:20 -0600 (MDT), Ronald G Minnich wrote: >On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Per Jessen wrote: > >> >Hhmmm, that's just gratuitous eye candy, no? Besides, it's pretty trivial >> >to replace those graphics with logos or other stuff. I think that doing >> >things that are new and usefull (like serial consoles) would really help >> >get people and hardware manufacturers interested. Imagine being able to >> >run a server farm with no graphics cards, just a serial console and >> >ethernet... > >we make it easier. We do all our admin on linuxbios clusters over >ethernet. Serial console admin is not our idea of a good time. Completely agree - the serial console is only handy when you have no ethernet. We've recently moved a 16 node cluster, which caused a couple of harddrives to give up - the serial consoles came in quite handy. regards, Per Jessen regards, Per Jessen, Principal Engineer, ENIDAN Technologies Ltd http://www.enidan.com - home of the J1 serial console. ---------------------------------------------------------- Please note: This message is intended for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended, or is not the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email. Thank you. - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

1 0

Re: [OpenBIOS] Re: boy is EFI a kludge!
by ebiederman＠lnxi.com Aug. 28, 2001

Aug. 28, 2001

Ronald G Minnich <rminnich(a)lanl.gov> writes: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Chris Maresca wrote: > > > There was a post on /. today about a BIOS that boots in .8 sec. That > > seems to be pretty good... Now all we need to do is speed up linux > > boot... > > > we talked about that on the linuxbios list. That was a stupid publicity > stunt. .8 sec is actually pretty slow. Well I wouldn't call it slow. I'd say someone has achieved a reasonable BIOS boot time with a stock BIOS. Eric - To unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo(a)freiburg.linux.de with 'unsubscribe openbios' in the body of the message

1 0