Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> --- i have not looked at the datasheet... do we still want this in? then ill commit it with the previous patch... or my tested stuff branch? Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> --- satasii.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/satasii.c b/satasii.c index a68a0c4..18003b8 100644 --- a/satasii.c +++ b/satasii.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ int satasii_init(void) { uint32_t addr; uint16_t reg_offset; + uint32_t tmp; if (rget_io_perms()) return 1; @@ -101,6 +102,13 @@ int satasii_init(void) if ((id != 0x0680) && (!(pci_mmio_readl(sii_bar) & (1 << 26)))) msg_pinfo("Warning: Flash seems unconnected.\n"); + msg_pdbg("Using BAR5 access method.\n"); + tmp = pci_read_long(pcidev_dev, 0x40) & (1 << 1); + msg_pdbg("BAR5 Indirect Access is %sabled\n", tmp ? "en" : "dis"); + /* This bit has contradicting definitions in the 3512 datasheet. */ + tmp = pci_read_long(pcidev_dev, 0x88) & (1 << 16); + msg_pdbg("BAR5 Access is %sabled\n", tmp ? "en" : "dis"); + if (register_shutdown(satasii_shutdown, NULL)) return 1; -- Kind regards, Stefan Tauner