May 2024 - flashrom-gerrit - mail.coreboot.org

Change in ...flashrom[master]: Add support for security register and SBULK command on Macronix chips
by vl_sk (Code Review) Jan. 13, 2026

Jan. 13, 2026

vl_sk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/32034 Change subject: Add support for security register and SBULK command on Macronix chips ...................................................................... Add support for security register and SBULK command on Macronix chips Signed-off-by: Vladimir Skokov <vl_sk(a)mail.ru> Change-Id: I6b3d7bd2625dec5fda7b85f421d40c49bbc528a6 --- M chipdrivers.h M flashchips.c M spi.h M spi25_statusreg.c 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/34/32034/1 diff --git a/chipdrivers.h b/chipdrivers.h index 134ed26..54288cd 100644 --- a/chipdrivers.h +++ b/chipdrivers.h @@ -102,7 +102,9 @@ int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25(struct flashctx *flash); int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25vf016(struct flashctx *flash); int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25vf040b(struct flashctx *flash); +int spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25(struct flashctx *flash); int spi_disable_blockprotect_sst26_global_unprotect(struct flashctx *flash); +int spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect(struct flashctx *flash); /* sfdp.c */ int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash); diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c index d85ea74..2c662e9 100644 --- a/flashchips.c +++ b/flashchips.c @@ -8555,9 +8555,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register and SBLK/SBULK; MX25L12835F: configuration register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) supported */ .voltage = {2700, 3600}, @@ -8604,9 +8603,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register and SBLK/SBULK; MX25L12835F: configuration register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) supported */ .voltage = {2700, 3600}, @@ -8693,9 +8691,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, @@ -8734,9 +8731,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, @@ -8776,9 +8772,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, @@ -8818,9 +8813,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, @@ -8858,9 +8852,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, /* Multi I/O supported */ .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, @@ -8907,9 +8900,8 @@ .block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7, } }, - /* TODO: security register */ - .printlock = spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd, /* bit6 is quad enable */ - .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd, + .printlock = spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25, + .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect, .write = spi_chip_write_256, /* Multi I/O supported */ .read = spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */ .voltage = {1650, 2000}, diff --git a/spi.h b/spi.h index 422e6a0..456d894 100644 --- a/spi.h +++ b/spi.h @@ -170,6 +170,15 @@ From ANY mode (3-bytes or 4-bytes) it works with 4-byte address */ #define JEDEC_BYTE_PROGRAM_4BA 0x12 +/* Read Security Register */ +#define JEDEC_RDSCUR 0x2B +#define JEDEC_RDSCUR_OUTSIZE 0x01 +#define JEDEC_RDSCUR_INSIZE 0x01 + +/* Do GBULK (gang block unlock) */ +#define JEDEC_GBULK 0x98 +#define JEDEC_GBULK_OUTSIZE 0x01 + /* Error codes */ #define SPI_GENERIC_ERROR -1 #define SPI_INVALID_OPCODE -2 diff --git a/spi25_statusreg.c b/spi25_statusreg.c index 4cf7023..4cdf800 100644 --- a/spi25_statusreg.c +++ b/spi25_statusreg.c @@ -237,6 +237,28 @@ return spi_disable_blockprotect_generic(flash, 0x7C, 1 << 7, 0, 0xFF); } +int spi_disable_blockprotect_mx25_global_unprotect(struct flashctx *flash) +{ + static const unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_GBULK_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_GBULK }; + int ret; + + ret = spi_write_enable(flash); + if (ret) { + msg_cerr("Set WREN failed!\n"); + return -1; + } + + /* Send GBULK cmd to device. */ + ret = spi_send_command(flash, sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL); + if (ret) { + msg_cerr("GBULK failed!\n"); + return -1; + } + + /* Disable standard blockprotect */ + return spi_disable_blockprotect_bp3_srwd(flash); +} + static void spi_prettyprint_status_register_hex(uint8_t status) { msg_cdbg("Chip status register is 0x%02x.\n", status); @@ -751,3 +773,32 @@ msg_cdbg("Resulting block protection : %s\n", bpt[(status & 0x1c) >> 2]); return 0; } + +/* === Macronix chips with Security Register === */ + +int spi_read_security_register(struct flashctx *flash) +{ + static const unsigned char cmd[JEDEC_RDSCUR_OUTSIZE] = { JEDEC_RDSCUR }; + unsigned char readarr[JEDEC_RDSCUR_INSIZE]; + int ret; + + ret = spi_send_command(flash, sizeof(cmd), sizeof(readarr), cmd, readarr); + if (ret) { + msg_cerr("RDSCUR failed!\n"); + return 0; + } + + return readarr[0]; +} + +int spi_prettyprint_security_register_mx25(struct flashctx *flash) +{ + int security_register = spi_read_security_register(flash); + int wpsel = !!(security_register & (1 << 7)); + + msg_cdbg("Chip security register: 0x%02X\n", security_register); + msg_cdbg("\tWPSEL is %s\n", wpsel ? "ON" : "OFF"); + + /* Print standard blockprotect info */ + return spi_prettyprint_status_register_bp3_srwd(flash); +} \ No newline at end of file -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/32034 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I6b3d7bd2625dec5fda7b85f421d40c49bbc528a6 Gerrit-Change-Number: 32034 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: vl_sk Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

4 6

Change in flashrom[master]: pcidev: On arm64 we are not getting a valid BAR0 address
by Martijn Berger (Code Review) Sept. 13, 2025

Sept. 13, 2025

Martijn Berger has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/39965 ) Change subject: pcidev: On arm64 we are not getting a valid BAR0 address ...................................................................... pcidev: On arm64 we are not getting a valid BAR0 address It seems that there is some code to work around a possible bug in old versions of libpci. This trusts libpci if it is new enough Change-Id: I8bd32c6344b0831a949c3853abeb84905420922a Signed-off-by: Martijn Berger <martijn.berger(a)gmail.com> --- M pcidev.c M programmer.h 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/65/39965/1 diff --git a/pcidev.c b/pcidev.c index 54c1fd3..973acde 100644 --- a/pcidev.c +++ b/pcidev.c @@ -30,20 +30,47 @@ TYPE_UNKNOWN }; +int pci_bar_nuber_from_offset(int offset) +{ + switch (offset) { + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0: + return 0; + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1: + return 1; + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_2: + return 2; + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_3: + return 3; + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_4: + return 4; + case PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_5: + return 5; + default: + return -1; + } + return -1; +} + uintptr_t pcidev_readbar(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar) { uint64_t addr; uint32_t upperaddr; uint8_t headertype; uint16_t supported_cycles; + int bar_number; enum pci_bartype bartype = TYPE_UNKNOWN; headertype = pci_read_byte(dev, PCI_HEADER_TYPE) & 0x7f; msg_pspew("PCI header type 0x%02x\n", headertype); + bar_number = pci_bar_nuber_from_offset(bar); - /* Don't use dev->base_addr[x] (as value for 'bar'), won't work on older libpci. */ - addr = pci_read_long(dev, bar); + if (PCI_LIB_VERSION >= 0x030500 && bar_number > -1) { + addr = dev->base_addr[bar_number]; + } else { + /* Don't use dev->base_addr[x] (as value for 'bar'), won't work on older libpci. */ + addr = pci_read_long(dev, bar); + } /* Sanity checks. */ switch (headertype) { diff --git a/programmer.h b/programmer.h index 9a41be1..5d4c1d7 100644 --- a/programmer.h +++ b/programmer.h @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ // FIXME: This needs to be local, not global(?) extern struct pci_access *pacc; int pci_init_common(void); +int pci_bar_nuber_from_offset(int offset); uintptr_t pcidev_readbar(struct pci_dev *dev, int bar); struct pci_dev *pcidev_init(const struct dev_entry *devs, int bar); /* rpci_write_* are reversible writes. The original PCI config space register -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/39965 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I8bd32c6344b0831a949c3853abeb84905420922a Gerrit-Change-Number: 39965 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Martijn Berger Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

5 6

Change in flashrom[master]: cli_classic.c: Add runtime measurement
by Simon Buhrow (Code Review) Aug. 19, 2025

Aug. 19, 2025

Simon Buhrow has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/47805 ) Change subject: cli_classic.c: Add runtime measurement ...................................................................... cli_classic.c: Add runtime measurement To get an fast and easy feedback on how parameters effect runtime (e.g. clock setting, polling delays, ...). Signed-off-by: Simon Buhrow <simon.buhrow(a)posteo.de> Change-Id: I2238b3f3e6c2ab7745994662a88787fa2e86d480 --- M cli_classic.c 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/05/47805/1 diff --git a/cli_classic.c b/cli_classic.c index ae7f6ef..0d5381f 100644 --- a/cli_classic.c +++ b/cli_classic.c @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <getopt.h> +#include <time.h> #include "flash.h" #include "flashchips.h" #include "fmap.h" @@ -142,6 +143,7 @@ /* Probe for up to eight flash chips. */ struct flashctx flashes[8] = {{0}}; struct flashctx *fill_flash; + struct timespec time_start, time_end; const char *name; int namelen, opt, i, j; int startchip = -1, chipcount = 0, option_index = 0, force = 0, ifd = 0, fmap = 0; @@ -528,6 +530,8 @@ /* FIXME: Delay calibration should happen in programmer code. */ myusec_calibrate_delay(); + timespec_get(&time_start, TIME_UTC); + if (programmer_init(prog, pparam)) { msg_perr("Error: Programmer initialization failed.\n"); ret = 1; @@ -806,6 +810,9 @@ for (i = 0; i < chipcount; i++) free(flashes[i].chip); + timespec_get(&time_end, TIME_UTC); + msg_gdbg("Runtime: %d:%2d min:s\n", (int)((time_end.tv_sec-time_start.tv_sec) / 60), (int)(time_end.tv_sec-time_start.tv_sec) % 60); + layout_cleanup(&include_args); free(filename); free(fmapfile); -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/47805 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2238b3f3e6c2ab7745994662a88787fa2e86d480 Gerrit-Change-Number: 47805 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Simon Buhrow Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

5 11

Change in flashrom[master]: libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) April 7, 2025

April 7, 2025

Edward O'Callaghan has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38993 ) Change subject: libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols ...................................................................... libflashrom.map: Add missing symbols The following symbols were missing at link-time from libflashrom: supported_flash_chips; supported_boards; supported_chipsets; Change-Id: I299928d62788c0abfe7f6cdd3e8ad8be0c49e45e Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M libflashrom.map 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/93/38993/1 diff --git a/libflashrom.map b/libflashrom.map index d6dd24d..9430775 100644 --- a/libflashrom.map +++ b/libflashrom.map @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ flashrom_set_log_callback; flashrom_shutdown; flashrom_supported_programmers; + flashrom_supported_flash_chips; + flashrom_supported_boards; + flashrom_supported_chipsets; flashrom_system_info; flashrom_version_info; local: *; -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/38993 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I299928d62788c0abfe7f6cdd3e8ad8be0c49e45e Gerrit-Change-Number: 38993 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

4 3

Change in flashrom[master]: tests/: Add programmer enumerate correspondence test
by Edward O'Callaghan (Code Review) Sept. 21, 2024

Sept. 21, 2024

Edward O'Callaghan has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/47356 ) Change subject: tests/: Add programmer enumerate correspondence test ...................................................................... tests/: Add programmer enumerate correspondence test The enumerate defines within programmer.h must be aligned with the programmer dispatch table within flashrom.c. The following unit-tests tries to improve coverage here to avoid issues like we saw when ENE and MEC1308 were upstreamed. BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=meson test Change-Id: I13efc4561f743edf51326d4b408be8715b630377 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)google.com> --- M tests/flashrom.c M tests/tests.c M tests/tests.h 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/56/47356/1 diff --git a/tests/flashrom.c b/tests/flashrom.c index 50464dd..9180922 100644 --- a/tests/flashrom.c +++ b/tests/flashrom.c @@ -15,6 +15,47 @@ #include <include/test.h> +/* must be before programmer.h include */ +#define CONFIG_INTERNAL 1 +#define CONFIG_DUMMY 1 +#define CONFIG_MEC1308 1 +#define CONFIG_NIC3COM 1 +#define CONFIG_NICREALTEK 1 +#define CONFIG_NICNATSEMI 1 +#define CONFIG_GFXNVIDIA 1 +#define CONFIG_RAIDEN 1 +#define CONFIG_DRKAISER 1 +#define CONFIG_SATASII 1 +#define CONFIG_ATAHPT 1 +#define CONFIG_ATAVIA 1 +#define CONFIG_ATAPROMISE 1 +#define CONFIG_IT8212 1 +#define CONFIG_FT2232_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_SERPROG 1 +#define CONFIG_BUSPIRATE_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_DEDIPROG 1 +#define CONFIG_DEVELOPERBOX_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_ENE_LPC 1 +#define CONFIG_RAYER_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_PONY_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_NICINTEL 1 +#define CONFIG_NICINTEL_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_NICINTEL_EEPROM 1 +#define CONFIG_OGP_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_SATAMV 1 +#define CONFIG_LINUX_MTD 1 +#define CONFIG_LINUX_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_LSPCON_I2C_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_REALTEK_MST_I2C_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_USBBLASTER_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_MSTARDDC_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_PICKIT2_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_CH341A_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_DIGILENT_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_JLINK_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_NI845X_SPI 1 +#define CONFIG_STLINKV3_SPI 1 + #include "programmer.h" void flashbuses_to_text_test_success(void **state) @@ -49,3 +90,54 @@ bustype = BUS_NONE; assert_string_equal(flashbuses_to_text(bustype), "None"); } + +void validate_prog_enumerates_test_success(void **state) +{ + (void) state; /* unused */ + + enum programmer prog = PROGRAMMER_INTERNAL; + const char *prog_names[] = { + "internal", + "dummy", + "mec1308", + "nic3com", + "nicrealtek", + "nicnatsemi", + "gfxnvidia", + "raiden_debug", + "drkaiser", + "satasii", + "atahpt", + "atavia", + "atapromise", + "it8212", + "ft2232_spi", + "serprog", + "buspirate_spi", + "dediprog", + "developerbox", + "ene_lpc", + "rayer_spi", + "pony_spi", + "nicintel", + "nicintel_spi", + "nicintel_eeprom", + "ogp_spi", + "satamv", + "linux_mtd", + "linux_spi", + "lspcon_i2c_spi", + "realtek_mst_i2c_spi", + "usbblaster_spi", + "mstarddc_spi", + "pickit2_spi", + "ch341a_spi", + "digilent_spi", + "jlink_spi", + "ni845x_spi", + "stlinkv3_spi", + }; + for (; prog < PROGRAMMER_INVALID; prog++) { + assert_string_equal(programmer_table[prog].name, prog_names[prog]); + } +} diff --git a/tests/tests.c b/tests/tests.c index 3124607..d2a22a5 100644 --- a/tests/tests.c +++ b/tests/tests.c @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ const struct CMUnitTest flashrom_tests[] = { cmocka_unit_test(flashbuses_to_text_test_success), + cmocka_unit_test(validate_prog_enumerates_test_success), }; ret |= cmocka_run_group_tests_name("flashrom.c tests", flashrom_tests, NULL, NULL); diff --git a/tests/tests.h b/tests/tests.h index cb905fd..89fc7fa 100644 --- a/tests/tests.h +++ b/tests/tests.h @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ /* flashrom.c */ void flashbuses_to_text_test_success(void **state); +void validate_prog_enumerates_test_success(void **state); /* spi25.c */ void spi_write_enable_test_success(void **state); -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/47356 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I13efc4561f743edf51326d4b408be8715b630377 Gerrit-Change-Number: 47356 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

6 8

Change in flashrom[master]: Makefile: Check for last line only from preprocessed output
by Khem Raj (Code Review) Aug. 1, 2024

Aug. 1, 2024

Khem Raj has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/43770 ) Change subject: Makefile: Check for last line only from preprocessed output ...................................................................... Makefile: Check for last line only from preprocessed output This started to fail with glibc 2.32 since glibc added additional attributes to functions in signal.h therefore existing regexp started to fail as it is not able to handle these functions e.g. extern int siginterrupt (int __sig, int __interrupt) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) __attribute__ ((__deprecated__ ("Use sigaction with SA_RESTART instead"))); grep -v '^\#' | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"' bit outside of fd_set selected Use sigaction with SA_RESTART instead arm So changing it to tail -1 | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"' arm Produces the expected result, this was hidden until now Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem(a)gmail.com> Change-Id: I123a046e142d54632f12d54e2aa09b0928c02b91 --- M Makefile 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/70/43770/1 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 803529f..3795681 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ # IMPORTANT: The following line must be placed before TARGET_OS is ever used # (of course), but should come after any lines setting CC because the line # below uses CC itself. -override TARGET_OS := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E os.h 2>/dev/null | grep -v '^\#' | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"')) +override TARGET_OS := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E os.h 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"')) ifeq ($(TARGET_OS), Darwin) override CPPFLAGS += -I/opt/local/include -I/usr/local/include @@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ # IMPORTANT: The following line must be placed before ARCH is ever used # (of course), but should come after any lines setting CC because the line # below uses CC itself. -override ARCH := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E archtest.c 2>/dev/null | grep -v '^\#' | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"')) -override ENDIAN := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E endiantest.c 2>/dev/null | grep -v '^\#')) +override ARCH := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E archtest.c 2>/dev/null | tail -1 | grep '"' | cut -f 2 -d'"')) +override ENDIAN := $(strip $(call debug_shell,$(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) -E endiantest.c 2>/dev/null | tail -1)) # Disable the internal programmer on unsupported architectures (everything but x86 and mipsel) ifneq ($(ARCH)-little, $(filter $(ARCH),x86 mips)-$(ENDIAN)) -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/43770 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I123a046e142d54632f12d54e2aa09b0928c02b91 Gerrit-Change-Number: 43770 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Khem Raj Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

4 5

Change in flashrom[master]: Add -- to make clean
by Ryan O'Leary (Code Review) Aug. 1, 2024

Aug. 1, 2024

Ryan O'Leary has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/37776 ) Change subject: Add -- to make clean ...................................................................... Add -- to make clean Somehow, I ended up with a file name "-c.d". I probably made it by mistake. This change lets "make clean" be a bit more resilient to files such as these. Change-Id: I2517ffac975f3df75f706350a07f189a98a11b7c Signed-off-by: Ryan O'Leary <ryanoleary(a)google.com> --- M Makefile 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/76/37776/1 diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 518d41b..fa66910 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ # This includes all frontends and libflashrom. # We don't use EXEC_SUFFIX here because we want to clean everything. clean: - rm -f $(PROGRAM) $(PROGRAM).exe libflashrom.a *.o *.d $(PROGRAM).8 $(PROGRAM).8.html $(BUILD_DETAILS_FILE) + rm -f -- $(PROGRAM) $(PROGRAM).exe libflashrom.a *.o *.d $(PROGRAM).8 $(PROGRAM).8.html $(BUILD_DETAILS_FILE) @+$(MAKE) -C util/ich_descriptors_tool/ clean distclean: clean -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/37776 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2517ffac975f3df75f706350a07f189a98a11b7c Gerrit-Change-Number: 37776 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Ryan O'Leary <ryanoleary(a)google.com> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange

6 8

[L] Change in flashrom[main]: erasure_layout: Fix get_flash_region bug
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) May 31, 2024

May 31, 2024

Attention is currently required from: Aarya, Alexander Goncharov, Nikolai Artemiev, Peter Marheine. Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change by Peter Marheine. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82393?usp=email ) Change subject: erasure_layout: Fix get_flash_region bug ...................................................................... Patch Set 14: (1 comment) File erasure_layout.c: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82393/comment/fecea642_135db866?us… : PS13, Line 368: for (unsigned int addr = region_start; addr <= region_end; addr += len) { > I have changed tests, and looked into debugging messages, and now I have a piece of mind that the bu […] I made CB:82723 to illustrate, the issue repro on head Now the question is, how urgent the issue is. The memory is erased correctly, but not in an optimal way. Peter what do you think? (also for this latest patchset, Jenkins is not adding a comment, but the results are here https://qa.coreboot.org/job/flashrom_gerrit/11678/console) -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82393?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic5bf9d0f0e4a94c48d6f6e74e3cb9cccdc7adec9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 82393 Gerrit-PatchSet: 14 Gerrit-Owner: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net> Gerrit-Reviewer: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Reviewer: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply(a)coreboot.org> Gerrit-Attention: Aarya <aarya.chaumal(a)gmail.com> Gerrit-Attention: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev(a)google.com> Gerrit-Attention: Peter Marheine <pmarheine(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Attention: Alexander Goncharov <chat(a)joursoir.net> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:55:32 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>

1 0

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: [WIP] Erase blocks are selected smaller than expected
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) May 31, 2024

May 31, 2024

Anastasia Klimchuk has posted comments on this change by Anastasia Klimchuk. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82723?usp=email ) Change subject: [WIP] Erase blocks are selected smaller than expected ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: Running this on head, erase blocks are more granular than expected, specifically: 1017 [ RUN ] Erase test case #6 1018 Creating layout ... done 1019 Dummyflasher initialising with param=""... done 1020 Erase test case #6 started. 1021 Eraser called with blockaddr=0xf, blocklen=0x1 1022 read_chip called with start=0xf, len=0x1 1023 Eraser called with blockaddr=0xe, blocklen=0x1 1024 read_chip called with start=0xe, len=0x1 1025 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x6, blocklen=0x2 1026 read_chip called with start=0x6, len=0x2 1027 Eraser called with blockaddr=0xc, blocklen=0x2 1028 read_chip called with start=0xc, len=0x2 1029 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x8, blocklen=0x4 1030 read_chip called with start=0x8, len=0x4 1031 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x2, blocklen=0x2 1032 read_chip called with start=0x2, len=0x2 1033 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x4, blocklen=0x2 1034 read_chip called with start=0x4, len=0x2 1035 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x0, blocklen=0x2 1036 read_chip called with start=0x0, len=0x2 1037 Erase test case #6 returned 0. 1038 Erased chip memory state for Erase test case #6 is CORRECT 1039 Eraseblocks order of invocation for Erase test case #6 is WRONG 1040 Eraseblocks number of invocations for Erase test case #6 is WRONG, expected 4 actual 8 1021 Eraser called with blockaddr=0xf, blocklen=0x1 1023 Eraser called with blockaddr=0xe, blocklen=0x1 -> this could be one eraseblock of size 2 1031 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x2, blocklen=0x2 1033 Eraser called with blockaddr=0x4, blocklen=0x2 -> this could be one eraseblock of size 4 -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82723?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I47851d2b6106075111babf8c3535e5394cbbe0f9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 82723 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:51:58 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No

1 0

[XS] Change in flashrom[main]: [WIP] Erase blocks are selected smaller than expected
by Anastasia Klimchuk (Code Review) May 31, 2024

May 31, 2024

Anastasia Klimchuk has uploaded this change for review. ( https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82723?usp=email ) Change subject: [WIP] Erase blocks are selected smaller than expected ...................................................................... [WIP] Erase blocks are selected smaller than expected Change-Id: I47851d2b6106075111babf8c3535e5394cbbe0f9 Signed-off-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)flashrom.org> --- M tests/erase_func_algo.c 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) git pull ssh://review.coreboot.org:29418/flashrom refs/changes/23/82723/1 diff --git a/tests/erase_func_algo.c b/tests/erase_func_algo.c index b0969c2..83f27b6 100644 --- a/tests/erase_func_algo.c +++ b/tests/erase_func_algo.c @@ -415,11 +415,11 @@ * Test case #6 * * Initial vs written: 7 bytes the same, 1 bytes different, 8 bytes the same. - * One layout region covering the whole chip. + * Layout regions of size 2+4+10b. * Chip with eraseblocks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16. */ .chip = &chip_1_2_4_8_16, - .regions = {{0, MIN_REAL_CHIP_SIZE - 1, "whole chip"}}, + .regions = {{0, 1, "reg1"}, {2, 5, "reg2"}, {6, 15, "reg3"}, {15, MIN_REAL_CHIP_SIZE - 1, "tail"}}, .initial_buf = {0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0x1d, 0xa1, 0xa2, 0xa3, 0xa4, 0xa5, 0xa6, 0xa7, 0xa8}, .erased_buf = {ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE, @@ -428,8 +428,9 @@ ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE, ERASE_VALUE}, .written_buf = {0x1, 0x2, 0x3, 0x4, 0x5, 0x6, 0x7, 0xdd, 0xa1, 0xa2, 0xa3, 0xa4, 0xa5, 0xa6, 0xa7, 0xa8}, - .eraseblocks_expected = {{0x0, 0x10, TEST_ERASE_INJECTOR_5}}, - .eraseblocks_expected_ind = 1, + .eraseblocks_expected = {{0x6, 0x8, TEST_ERASE_INJECTOR_4}, {0xe, 0x2, TEST_ERASE_INJECTOR_2}, + {0x2, 0x4, TEST_ERASE_INJECTOR_3}, {0x0, 0x2, TEST_ERASE_INJECTOR_2}}, + .eraseblocks_expected_ind = 4, .erase_test_name = "Erase test case #6", .write_test_name = "Write test case #6", }, { -- To view, visit https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/82723?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://review.coreboot.org/settings?usp=email Gerrit-MessageType: newchange Gerrit-Project: flashrom Gerrit-Branch: main Gerrit-Change-Id: I47851d2b6106075111babf8c3535e5394cbbe0f9 Gerrit-Change-Number: 82723 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm(a)chromium.org>

1 0