[PATCH] Fixes printk so it prints very large strings

[Programmingkid]

Fixes printk function so it can print very large strings. This patch does allow me to see the full
bootscript in the serial console.

Signed-off-by: John Arbuckle

Index: arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c
===================================================================
--- arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(revision 1335)
+++ arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(working copy)
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 int
 printk( const char *fmt, ... )
 {
-        char *p, buf[1024];
+        char *p, buf[10024];
    va_list args;
    int i;

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

On 28/04/15 03:30, Programmingkid wrote:
> Fixes printk function so it can print very large strings. This patch does allow me to see the full
> bootscript in the serial console.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Arbuckle
> Index: arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c
>
> --- arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(revision 1335)
> +++ arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(working copy)
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
>  int
>  printk( const char *fmt, ... )
>  {
>    char *p, buf[1024];
>    char *p, buf[10024];
> va_list args;
>  int i;

Hmmm while this is useful as a debugging aid, I'd be a bit wary of
putting this into a mainstream OpenBIOS binary due to the lack of
available memory to OpenBIOS. Unless anyone can come up with a better
argument, I think it may just be a case of document this and move on.

ATB,

Mark.

[Programmingkid]

On Apr 28, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 28/04/15 03:30, Programmingkid wrote:
> > Fixes printk function so it can print very large strings. This patch does allow me to see the full
> > bootscript in the serial console.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Arbuckle
> > Index: arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c
> >
> > --- arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(revision 1335)
> > +++ arch/ppc/qemu/qemu.c	(working copy)
> > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
> > int
> > printk( const char *fmt, ... )
> > {
> >    char *p, buf[1024];
> >    char *p, buf[10024];
> > va_list args;
> >  int i;
>
> Hmmm while this is useful as a debugging aid, I'd be a bit wary of
> putting this into a mainstream OpenBIOS binary due to the lack of
> available memory to OpenBIOS. Unless anyone can come up with a better
> argument, I think it may just be a case of document this and move on.

That is only 10 KB of ram. That's not very much ram. I have booting OpenBIOS many
times since the patch was implemented and have seen no problems with it.